Skip to main content
. 2017 May 2;7(6):e00711. doi: 10.1002/brb3.711

Table 3.

Comparison of lncRNAs expression between suicidal ideation groups and controls (x¯ ±s)

Probes No suicidal ideation (= 63) Suicidal ideation (= 57) Controls (= 43) F p
TCONS_00019174 6.93 ± 2.28 4.75 ± 3.68a 6.40 ± 3.18 7.93 <.01
ENST00000566208 6.34 ± 2.32 4.14 ± 3.69a 5.97 ± 3.13 8.47 <.01
NONHSAG045500 8.27 ± 2.29 5.71 ± 3.89a 5.97 ± 3.13 11.11 <.01
ENST00000517573 7.57 ± 2.48 5.01 ± 3.89a 7.02 ± 3.19 10.08 <.01
NONHSAT034045 7.00 ± 2.50 4.46 ± 4.09a 6.66 ± 3.25 9.78 <.01
NONHSAT142707 9.20 ± 2.34 6.81 ± 3.84a 8.65 ± 3.26 9.01 <.01
a

There were significant difference between suicidal ideation group and no suicidal ideation group (p < .01), suicidal ideation group and controls (p < .01). No significant difference existed between no suicidal ideation group and controls (p > .05).