Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 14;61(1):1331658. doi: 10.1080/16546628.2017.1331658

Table 1.

Orthogonal analysis of CTMS labelling (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01) including the factors and levels (A), the arrangement and results of orthogonal experiments (B), and the variance analysis (C).

Levels Factors
(A) pH (B) Temperature (°C) (C) Ratio of CTMS:FITC (D) Concentration of CTMS (mg/ml)
A
1 5.5 15 100:1.5 1
2 7.5 25 100:3 1.5
3 9.5 35 100:4.5 2
No.
A
B
C
D
Label efficiency (%)
B
1 1 1 1 1 0.05
2 1 2 2 2 0.43
3 1 3 3 3 1.92
4 2 1 2 3 1.49
5 2 2 3 1 2.65
6 2 3 1 2 0.60
7 3 1 3 2 0.97
8 3 2 1 3 0.75
9 3 3 2 1 0.34
K1 0.80 0.84 0.47 1.01  
K2 1.58 1.28 0.75 0.68  
K3 0.69 0.95 1.85 1.39  
R 0.89 0.44 1.38 0.72  
Factors
SS
f
F
F*
Significance
C
A 4.04 2 2.02 518.44 **
B 1.09 2 0.54 139.68 *
C 9.89 2 4.94 1268.5 **
D 2.29 2 1.15 294.03 *