Table 4.
Comparison by GO enrichment analysis
| Network | Method | # complex | % enriched | # GO | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SceDIP | FLCD | 2134 | 72.2 | 1442 | |||||||
| CONE | 380 | 71.8 | 852 | ||||||||
| LinkC | 1839 | 67.4 | 1273 | ||||||||
| SR-MCL | 2851 | 23.5 | 957 | ||||||||
| SceBG | FLCD | 4027 | 72.4 | 1800 | |||||||
| CONE | 522 | 77.4 | 1282 | ||||||||
| LinkC | 5382 | 39.8 | 1554 | ||||||||
| SR-MCL | 1862 | 56.4 | 1702 | ||||||||
| SceIntAct | FLCD | 3394 | 62.4 | 1414 | |||||||
| CONE | 496 | 65.6 | 1031 | ||||||||
| LinkC | 1297 | 46.5 | 1129 | ||||||||
| SR-MCL | 1079 | 44.7 | 888 | ||||||||
| SceMINT | FLCD | 2483 | 62.3 | 1416 | |||||||
| CONE | 513 | 59.4 | 954 | ||||||||
| LinkC | 2201 | 32.1 | 1123 | ||||||||
| SR-MCL | 3698 | 19.7 | 856 |
“% enriched” presents the percentage of complexes that are enriched with at least one GO term. “# GO” denotes the number of enriched GO terms
Bold values denote the best scores corresponding to specific criteria