Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Ment Health. 2016 Nov 1;7(1):36–49. doi: 10.1177/2156869316674056

Table 3.

Odds Ratios and 95% Confidence Intervals from Logistic Regression Models of Respondent Binge Drinking during Young Adulthood, N = 1,111

Model 1 Model 2
OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Partner Binge Drinking 2.73*** (2.06, 3.61) 2.33*** (1.61, 3.38)
Respondent Binge Drinking, WII 2.59*** (1.95, 3.45) 2.59*** (1.95, 3.45)
Respondent Depression, WIII 1.43 (0.95, 2.15) 1.43 (0.95, 2.15)
Respondent Gender (Male) 3.08*** (2.30, 4.11) 2.64*** (1.82, 3.83)
Age Difference between Partners 1.00 (0.95, 1.06) 1.00 (0.95, 1.05)
Race/Ethnicity (Ref = Both Partners White)
One Partner White 1.08 (0.71, 1.66) 1.07 (0.70, 1.64)
Neither Partner White 0.51*** (0.37, 0.70) 0.51*** (0.37, 0.70)
Current College Attendance (Ref = Both Partners in College)
One Partner in College 0.81 (0.53, 1.25) 0.81 (0.53, 1.25)
Neither Partner in College 0.70 (0.47, 1.05) 0.70 (0.47, 1.05)
Any Children in Household 0.93 (0.68, 1.27) 0.93 (0.68, 1.26)
Relationship Type (Ref = Cohabiting)
Dating 0.95 (0.68, 1.34) 0.94 (0.67, 1.33)
Married 0.89 (0.63, 1.25) 0.89 (0.63, 1.25)
Relationship Duration (in Months) 0.99 (0.99, 1.00) 0.99 (0.99, 1.00)
Partner Binge Drinking × Respondent Gender (Male) 1.43 (0.82, 2.51)

p≤0.10;

*

p≤0.05;

**

p≤0.01;

***

p≤0.001