Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Ment Health. 2016 Nov 1;7(1):36–49. doi: 10.1177/2156869316674056

Table 4.

Odds Ratios and 95% Confidence Intervals from Logistic Regression Models of Respondent Binge Drinking during Young Adulthood, N = 1,111

Model 1 Model 2
OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Partner Depression 0.77 (0.52, 1.15) 0.44* (0.23, 0.86)
Respondent Binge Drinking, WII 2.85*** (2.15, 3.77) 2.89*** (2.18, 3.84)
Respondent Depression, WIII 1.51* (1.01, 2.27) 1.53* (1.02, 2.30)
Respondent Gender (Male) 2.48*** (1.89, 3.25) 2.23*** (1.67, 2.96)
Age Difference between Partners 0.99 (0.94, 1.04) 0.99 (0.94, 1.04)
Race/Ethnicity (Ref = Both Partners White)
One Partner White 1.02 (0.67, 1.54) 1.01 (0.67, 1.54)
Neither Partner White 0.43*** (0.32, 0.58) 0.43*** (0.32, 0.58)
Current College Attendance (Ref = Both Partners in College)
One Partner in College 0.81 (0.53, 1.23) 0.81 (0.53, 1.23)
Neither Partner in College 0.67* (0.45, 0.99) 0.67* (0.45, 1.00)
Any Children in Household 0.92 (0.68, 1.25) 0.91 (0.67, 1.23)
Relationship Type (Ref = Cohabiting)
Dating 1.01 (0.72, 1.40) 1.02 (0.73, 1.42)
Married 0.86 (0.61, 1.20) 0.87 (0.62, 1.22)
Relationship Duration (in Months) 0.99* (0.99, 1.00) 0.99* (0.99, 1.00)
Partner Depression × Respondent Gender (Male) 2.53* (1.10, 5.84)

p≤0.10;

*

p≤0.05;

**

p≤0.01;

***

p≤0.001