Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

View full-text article in PMC

. 2017 May 28;15:541–558. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.05.017

Search in PMC
Search in PubMed
View in NLM Catalog
Add to search

© 2017 The Authors

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

PMC Copyright notice

Fig. 10 — Differential changes of EEG power for the acoustic CR neuromodulation and LFR-stimulation. The effect of acoustic CR neuromodulation on the sLORETA mean current source density as compared to the LFR-stimulation (format as in Fig. 9). Delta decrease (indicated by blue voxels) was significantly greater after acoustic CR neuromodulation as compared to the LFR-stimulation (A, B). Alpha increase (indicated by red voxels) was significantly greater after acoustic CR neuromodulation as compared to the LFR-stimulation (D, E). Gamma decrease (indicated by blue voxels) was significantly greater after acoustic CR neuromodulation as compared to the LFR-stimulation (G, H, J, K). Time course of the mean delta (C), alpha (F) and gamma (I) power during (averaged over the whole stimulation period) and after the end of acoustic CR neuromodulation (black) and the LFR-stimulation (red) expressed as a percentage change from the baseline activity. Significant differences in power between acoustic CR neuromodulation and the LFR-stimulation are marked with the horizontal black line on the top of the plot (C, F, I).