Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Behav. 2018 Mar;22(3):752–764. doi: 10.1007/s10461-016-1644-y

Table 1.

Review of methodological strengths and weaknesses of included studies

Study design (see key) N Appropriate definition of retention Multi-site (appropriate estimation of retention) Non-specific sample (generalizability of findings) Appropriate data analyses Broad range of variables measured/no missing data All additional contextual factors accounted for
Developed countries
Adams [22] R 561 + +
Althoff [14] P 867 + + + +
Blank [19] P 921 + + ?
Dombrowski [23] P 247 + + + ?
Giordano [15] R 2619 + + + + ?
Horberg [20] R >23,000 + + + ?
Kelly [26] P 168 + + + + ?
Lourenço [16] R 7621 + + + + ?
Mcmahon [18] R 4966 + ?
Noysk [12] R 6152 + + + ?
Rebeiro [17] P 61,438 + + + + + ?
Richey [21] C 99 + + ?
Scahfer [24] P 251 + + + ?
Tedaldi [7] P 1441 + + + + ?
Tobias [10] P 1000 + + + + + ?
Waldrop-Valverde [25] P 210 + + + ?
Developing countries
Allam [37] P 1690 + + ?
Boyles [27] P 1803 + + + ?
Charurat [28] P 5760 + + + + ?
Janssen [29] R 223 + + + ?
Koole [30] R 4147 + + + + ?
Krumme [40] P 610 + + +
Mekuria [31] R 836 + + + + ?
Mutasa-Apollo [32] R 3919 + + + + ?
Palombi [38] R 3749 + + + + ?
Thida [33] R 5718 + + + + ?
Ugoji [34] R 5176 + + + + ?
Vella [35] R 2835 + + + + ?
Vuylsteke [39] R 414 + + + +
Yang [36] R 822 + + + ?

R retrospective study, P prospective study, C cross-sectional study, + identified in the article, – not identified in the article, ? not addressed in the article