Table 5.
Relationship of baseline cognitive factors to likelihood of progression to algorithmic classification of mild cognitive impairment 5 years later (N = 1300)
| Algorithm and cognitive factor | AUC | Sensitivity | Specificity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cognition and CDR | |||
| General cognitive performance | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.71 |
| Memory | 0.77 | 0.67 | 0.74 |
| Executive factor | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.66 |
| CDR only | |||
| General cognitive performance | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.61 |
| Memory | 0.69 | 0.62 | 0.68 |
| Executive factor | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.61 |
| Cognition only | |||
| General cognitive performance | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.62 |
| Memory | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.64 |
| Executive factor | 0.65 | 0.57 | 0.66 |
Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; CDR, Clinical Dementia Rating; ROC, receiving operating characteristic.
NOTE. These ROC analyses show the algorithmic classification based on both cognitive factors and CDR 5 years after baseline and are marginally more associated with baseline cognitive test performance than other algorithmic classifications.