Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 6;19:65–73. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2017.05.035

Table 2.

Summarized of the results of the meta-analysis.

Comparison No. of studies n OR 95% CI p-value Heterogeneity
Eager's test Rank correlation test Absolute risk differences Number need to treat
I2 P
Control vs. Epinephrine group
 Overall postpolypectomy bleeding 4 1062 0.38 0.21–0.66 0.0006a 0% 0.62 0.108 0.174 0.25 4
 Early postplypectomy bleeding 4 1062 0.38 0.20–0.69 0.002a 0% 0.53 0.105 0.497 0.05 20
 Delayed postpolypectomy bleeding 2 811 0.45 0.11–1.81 0.26 0% 0.26 0.247 0.467 0.01 100
Mechanical vs. Epinephrine group
 Overall postpolypectomy bleeding 3 547 0.33 0.13–0.87 0.03a 0% 0.59 0.634 0.602 0.04 25
 Early postplypectomy bleeding 3 547 0.29 0.08–1.02 0.05a 0% 0.45 0.491 0.602 0.03 33
 Delayed postpolypectomy bleeding 3 547 0.58 0.13–2.49 0.46 0% 0.94 0.403 0.602 0.01 100

OR = Odds ratio, 95%CI = 95% Confidential interval.

a

Statistical significant.