Kitazawa 1990.
Methods |
Study design: parallel‐group RCT Country: not reported Number randomized: Total: 23 eyes (17 participants) Per group: not reported Exclusions after randomization: not reported Number analyzed: Total: not reported Per group: not reported Unit of analysis: eyes Losses to follow‐up: not reported How was missing data handled?: not reported Reported power calculation: no Unusual study design?: none |
|
Participants |
Age: not reported Females: not reported Inclusion criteria: participants with POAG undergoing ALT Exclusion criteria: not reported Equivalence of baseline characteristics: not reported |
|
Interventions |
Intervention 1: 1 drop apraclonidine 1%, 1 hour before and immediately after ALT Intervention 2: 1 drop placebo, 1 hour before and immediately after ALT Length of follow‐up: Planned: 24 hours Actual: 24 hours |
|
Outcomes |
Primary outcomes: IOP, flare intensity Secondary outcomes: not reported Adverse events reported: no Intervals at which outcomes assessed: participants observed during a 24‐hour observation period, but specific time points not described. |
|
Notes |
Trial registration: not reported Funding sources: not reported Disclosures of interest: not reported Study period: not reported Reported subgroup analyses: no |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Randomization sequence generation not described. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Allocation concealment not reported. |
Masking of participants and personnel (performance bias) | Low risk | "We studied the effects of this compound on the inflammatory reaction and the IOP responses to ALT in a randomized, double‐masked manner." |
Masking of outcome assessment (detection bias) | Low risk | "We studied the effects of this compound on the inflammatory reaction and the IOP responses to ALT in a randomized, double‐masked manner." |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Unclear whether there were any missing data or how they were handled. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Unclear whether there was selective outcome reporting. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Funding sources not reported. |