Skip to main content
. 2017 May 4;12(5):734–743. doi: 10.2215/CJN.10601016

Table 3.

Multivariable prediction models for renal flare and ESRD

Model ISN/RPS Class I–V (n=105) ISN/RPS Class III/IV (±V)a (n=91)
HR (95% CI) P Value HR (95% CI) P Value
Renal flare (n=99)
 Nonwhite 2.23 (1.23 to 4.04) 0.01 2.08 (1.09 to 3.98) 0.03
 % Fibrinoid necrosis (glomerular) 1.04 (1.00 to 1.07) 0.04 1.04 (1.00 to 1.08) 0.04
ESRD (n=105)
 Nonwhite 7.16 (2.34 to 21.91) 0.001 9.12 (2.85 to 29.22) <0.001
 Age0, yr 1.02 (0.99 to 1.06) 0.18 1.02 (0.99 to 1.06) 0.23
 eGFR0, mL/min per 1.73 m2 0.98 (0.97 to 1.00) <0.05 0.99 (0.97 to 1.00) 0.12
 % Fibrinoid necrosis (glomerular) 1.08 (1.02 to 1.13) 0.004 1.07 (1.02 to 1.13) 0.01
 % Fibrous crescents 1.09 (1.02 to 1.17) 0.02 1.10 (1.02 to 1.19) 0.01
 IF/TA≥25% 3.89 (1.25 to 12.14) 0.02 4.53 (1.40 to 14.73) 0.01

ISN/RPS, International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society; HR, hazard ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; Age0, age at time of biopsy; eGFR0, eGFR at the time of renal biopsy; IF/TA, interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy.

a

Patients with class III/IV (±V) lupus nephritis who received induction immunosuppressive treatment with cytotoxic drugs were analyzed separately from the complete cohort.