Table 8.
Lipid profile | Control | Diab | Diab + Ethanol extract of leaves C. scolymus (200 mg/kg) | Diab + Ethanol extract of leaves C. scolymus (400 mg/kg) | Diab + Acarbose (12 mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
TG (mmol/L) | 0.57 ± 0.06 | 1.51 ± 0.36*** | 0.6 ± 0.05### | 0.54 ± 0.05### | 0.64 ± 0.07### |
T-Ch (mmol/L) | 1.45 ± 0.26 | 1.83 ± 0.11* | 1.59 ± 0.05#£££ | 1.67 ± 0.06#£££ | 1.28 ± 0.20### |
LDL-c (mmol/L) | 0.49 ± 0.17 | 0.9 ± 0.08*** | 0.56 ± 0.15### | 0.6 ± 0.10### | 0.55 ± 0.21### |
HDL-c (mmol/L) | 0.52 ± 0.07 | 0.27 ± 0.01*** | 0.47 ± 0.03###£ | 0.50 ± 0.07###£ | 0.33 ± 0.04### |
HTR (%) | 23.05 ± 5.88 | 15.69 ± 0.50* | 26.69 ± 1.82### | 29.53 ± 3.21### | 28.10 ± 3.27### |
AI | 2.00 ± 0.07 | 3.83 ± 0.74*** | 2.54 ± 0.20# | 2.4 ± 0.39# | 2.58 ± 0.44# |
LDL-c/HDL-c | 1.28 ± 0.15 | 2.32 ± 0.15*** | 2.11 ± 0.09# | 1.6 ± 1.10### | 1.73 ± 0.41# |
Diabetic rats were orally administered with ethanol extract from leaves of C. scolymus and acarbose at the doses mentioned earlier for 28 days. Values are given as means ± SD (n = 8). * p ≤ 0.05, *** p ≤ 0.001 were considered significant compared to control group; # p ≤ 0.05, ### p ≤ 0.001 were considered significant compared to diabetic rat.; £ p ≤ 0.05, £££ p ≤ 0.001 compared to diabetic rats treated with acarbose, ns: non-significant changes between diabetic treated groups vs. the control group after 28 days treatment. AI = (T-Ch-HDL-c)/HDL-c, HTR (%) = HDL-C/T-Ch ratio