Table 9.
Groups of treatment | Cont | Diab | Diab + Ethanol extract of leaves C. scolymus (200 mg /kg) | Diab + Ethanol extract of leaves C. scolymus (400 mg/kg) | Diab + Acarbose (12 mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AST (UI/L) | 106.6 ± 1.19 | 158.25 ± 7.67*** | 90.25 ± 2.82### | 95.14 ± 2.47### | 101.66 ± 3.17### |
ALT (UI/L) | 35.33 ± 5.68 | 60.25 ± 8.18*** | 31.00 ± 4.64###£ | 35.16 ± 8.42### | 37.75 ± 5.73### |
ALP (UI/L) | 150.5 ± 1.57 | 200.8 ± 2.5*** | 180.00 ± 2.64### | 186.25 ± 1.81### | 175.14 ± 1.64### |
Albumin (g/l) | 35.40 ± 1.50 | 40 ± 0.78*** | 30.57 ± 1.17# | 32.4 ± 0.46### | 30.2 ± 0.50### |
Urea (mmol/L) | 4.76 ± 0.57 | 7.64 ± 0.89** | 6.41 ± 0.93### | 4.76 ± 0.57###£££ | 6.98 ± 1.26ns |
Creatinine (umol/L) | 14.64 ± 3.54 | 26.84 ± 3.77*** | 17.50 ± 3.39###£ | 19.66 ± 1.00## | 19.51 ± 5.25### |
Diabetic rats were orally administered with ethanol extract from leaves of C. scolymus and acarbose at the doses mentioned earlier for 28 days. Values are given as means ± SD (n = 8). ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001 were considered significant compared to control group; # p ≤ 0.05, ### p ≤ 0.001 were considered significant compared to diabetic rat.; £ p ≤ 0.05, £££ p ≤ 0.001 compared to diabetic rats treated with acarbose. ns: non-significant changes between diabetic treated groups vs. the control group after 28 days treatment