Table 1. Summary of Associations With Trabecular vBMD.
Locus | Position (build 36) | SNP | Nearest gene(s) (distance in kb)a | A1/A2 | A1 frequency | Beta for A1 | SE | Heterogeneity I2 | p | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||
Discovery (n = 12,287) | Combined (n = 15,275)b | |||||||||
Combined p < 5 × 10−8 for trabecular vBMD | ||||||||||
1p36.12 | 22444772 | rs12755933 | WNT4 (103) | C/G | 0.27 | −0.084 | 0.013 | 0 | 2.66 ×10−10 | 9.80 ×10−11 |
1p36.12 | 22554953 | rs12742784 | ZBTB40 (96) | C/T | 0.21 | 0.094 | 0.015 | 0 | 1.18 × 10−10 | 1.05 ×10−10 |
1q43 | 238659259 | rs9661787 | FMN2 (0)-GREM2 (60) | C/G | 0.81 | −0.098 | 0.015 | 0 | 1.26 × 10−10 | 1.29 ×10−11 |
5p13 | 36516441 | rs2468531 | SLC1A3 (126)-RANBP3L (179) | G/C | 0.03 | 0.221 | 0.037 | 0 | 1.47 × 10−9 | 1.91 × 10−8 |
8q24 | 120045437 | rs1485303 | TNFRSF11B (12) | A/G | 0.44 | −0.057 | 0.012 | 14.6 | 7.35 × 10−7 | 4.63 × 10−9 |
13q14 | 41862203 | rs17457561 | AKAP11 (67) (TNFSF11 [700]) | A/G | 0.25 | −0.095 | 0.014 | 0 | 1.95 × 10−12 | 1.12 × 10−11 |
Combined 5 × 10−8 ≤ p < 5 × 10−6 for trabecular vBMD | ||||||||||
2p21 | 54735125 | rs2941584 | SPTBN1 (0) | C/T | 0.32 | −0.060 | 0.012 | 33.5 | 1.26 × 10−6 | 1.29 ×10−7 |
6q25 | 151897286 | rs10872673 | C6orf97 (40) | G/T | 0.60 | 0.065 | 0.012 | 0 | 5.92 × 10−8 | 8.22 ×10−7 |
12p13.3 | 2378832 | rs7301013 | CACNA1C(298) | A/G | 0.83 | −0.076 | 0.016 | 39.4 | 1.45 × 10−6 | 4.90 × 10−7 |
12p12.1 | 28183168 | rs12813778 | CCDC91 (118)-PTHLH (167) | A/G | 0.23 | −0.068 | 0.014 | 32.9 | 1.16 × 10−6 | 2.35 ×10−6 |
12q21.3 | 88861177 | rs4842697 | ATP2B1 (287) | G/T | 0.57 | −0.057 | 0.012 | 22.4 | 9.09 × 10−7 | 2.60 × 10−6 |
16p13.3 | 315783 | rs9921222 | AXIN1 (27) | C/T | 0.47 | −0.059 | 0.012 | 0 | 6.09 × 10−7 | 4.90 × 10−7 |
vBMD = volumetric BMD.
Locus zoom plots are in Supplemental Fig. 3.
Observations were added by new genotyping in AGES (n = 2021) and/or by in silico replication in DHS (n = 967). The SNP association was considered to be replicated if the addition of the replication sample to the meta-analysis did not result in a p >5 × 10−8.