|
| Recommendations for
Revascularization for ALI |
|
| COR |
LOE |
Recommendations |
|
| I |
C-LD |
In patients with ALI, the
revascularization strategy should be determined by local
resources and patient factors (eg, etiology and degree of
ischemia).367–369
|
|
| See Online Data Supplement
47. |
For marginally or immediately
threatened limbs (Category IIa and IIb ALI [Figure 3]), revascularization
should be performed emergently (within 6 hours). For viable limbs
(Category I ALI [Figure
3]), revascularization should be performed an on
urgent basis (within 6–24 hours). The revascularization
strategy can range from catheter-directed thrombolysis to surgical
thromboembolectomy. Available facilities and clinical expertise are
factors that should be considered when determining the
revascularization strategy. The technique that will provide the most
rapid restoration of arterial flow with the least risk to the
patient should be selected. For example, catheter-directed
thrombolysis can provide rapid restoration of arterial flow to a
viable or marginally threatened limb, particularly in the setting of
recent occlusion, thrombosis of synthetic grafts, and stent
thrombosis.367 If this is not available locally, surgical
options for timely revascularization should be considered, along
with the feasibility of timely transfer to a facility with the
necessary expertise. |
|
| I |
A |
Catheter-based thrombolysis is
effective for patients with ALI and a salvageable
limb.367–371
|
|
| See Online Data Supplement
47. |
Assessment of the comparative
effectiveness of catheter-based thrombolysis versus open surgery is
complicated by variable definitions of ALI in this literature. Four
RCTs comparing catheter-based thrombolysis to surgery,367,369–371 as well as a
meta-analysis,368 have demonstrated similar limb salvage
rates between the 2 approaches but better survival with
catheter-based therapy. The survival advantage of catheter-based
therapy may be at least in part attributable to multiple
comorbidities found among the population of patients who present
with ALI. Increased comorbidities are likely to contribute to
increased perioperative risk. Several of the RCTs included patients
with relatively chronic ischemia. Acuity and severity are both
factors in the decision to consider thrombolysis.367,369–371
|
|
| I |
C-LD |
Amputation should be performed as
the first procedure in patients with a nonsalvageable
limb.372,373
|
|
| See Online Data Supplement
48. |
For patients with Category III ALI
(Figure 3), amputation
should be performed as the index procedure. Prolonged duration of
ischemia is the most common factor in patients requiring amputation
for treatment of ALI. The risks associated with reconstruction
outweigh the potential benefit in a limb that is already insensate
or immobile because of prolonged ischemia. Patients who have an
insensate and immobile limb in the setting of prolonged ischemia
(>6 to 8 hours) are unlikely to have potential for limb
salvage.34,362 In addition, in
this setting the reperfusion and circulation of ischemic metabolites
can result in multiorgan failure and cardiovascular collapse.
However, if pain can be controlled and there is no evidence of
infection, amputation may be deferred if this meets with the
patient's goals. |
|
| I |
C-LD |
Patients with ALI should be
monitored and treated (eg, fasciotomy) for compartment syndrome
after revascularization.372,373
|
|
| See Online Data Supplement
48. |
The lower extremity muscles reside in
compartments, surrounded by fascia and bones. Reperfusion to
ischemic muscles can cause cellular edema, resulting in increased
compartment pressure. When compartment pressure is >30 mm
Hg, there is capillary and venule compression that leads to
malperfusion of the muscle; this is compartment syndrome. Fasciotomy
is indicated when the compartment pressure increases. Measurement of
intracompartment pressure is not always easily accessible. In such
cases, evaluation for fasciotomy is prompted by development of
increased pain, tense muscle, or nerve injury. Fasciotomy should be
considered for patients with Category IIb ischemia for whom the time
to revascularization is >4 hours. |
|
| IIa |
B-NR |
In patients with ALI with a
salvageable limb, percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy can be
useful as adjunctive therapy to thrombolysis.374–378
|
|
| See Online Data Supplements 49 and
50. |
Multiple nonrandomized studies have
suggested that percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy in combination
with pharmacological therapy can be beneficial in the treatment of
threatened limbs.374–378
|
|
| IIa |
C-LD |
In patients with ALI due to
embolism and with a salvageable limb, surgical
thromboembolectomy can be effective.379–381
|
|
| See Online Data Supplements 49 and
50. |
Patients with arterial embolism and an
absent pulse ipsilateral to the ischemic limb can be treated by
exposure of an artery in the affected limb and balloon-catheter
thromboembolectomy. These patients may benefit from adjunctive
intraoperative fibrinolytics. In the event that thromboembolectomy
does not restore arterial flow, bypass can be performed.381–383
|
|
| IIb |
C-LD |
The usefulness of
ultrasound-accelerated catheter-based thrombolysis for patients
with ALI with a salvageable limb is unknown.384–386
|
|
| See Online Data Supplements 47 and
50. |
The use of ultrasound-accelerated
catheter delivery of thrombolytic agents has been published in case
series384
and retrospective analyses.385 However, the single RCT comparing this
technique to standard catheter-based thrombolytic therapy failed to
demonstrate a difference in outcomes, including bleeding, despite a
lower total amount of lytic delivered.386
|
|