Base for comparison – main assumption of ICM Poland |
Bandurska et al. (2016) |
Poland |
Cooperation between specialist and general care
Coordination of treatment
Supervision of patient’s compliance
Home care
Education and promotion of self-management
Support of multidisciplinary team
|
-
Study construction
-
IC model construction
– Home based support
– Supervision of compliance
– Multidisciplinary team
– Education for patients and families
– ICM available for patients in advanced COPD.
-
Results obtained
|
Comparison with IC studies |
Author (year) |
IC programme country |
Types of intervention used |
Similarities (ICM)In study design.In IC model construction.In results obtained
|
Differences (ICM)In study design.In IC model construction.In results obtained
|
Positive impact of IC |
Boven et al. (2014) |
Belgium |
Supervision of patient’s compliance
|
|
|
|
Steuten et al. |
Netherlands |
Support of multidisciplinary team.
Education and promotion of self-management.
Coordination of treatment
Supervision of patient’s compliance
|
– Pre-post test design
– 3 months follow up
|
|
|
Hermiz et al. (2002) |
Australia |
Supervision of patient’s compliance
Home care
Education and promotion of self-management
|
|
|
|
Casas et al. (2006) |
Belgium, Spain |
Coordination of treatment (individual treatment plan)
Multidisciplinary team
Web-based centre
Education and promotion of self-management
|
|
– Web-based centre
– Lack of home care
|
|
Titova et al. (2015) |
Norway |
Coordination of treatment (individual treatment plan)
Multidisciplinary team
Call centre
Education and promotion of self-management
|
|
– 2 years follow-up
– No cost analysis
|
|
Boland et al. (2015) |
Netherlands |
Coordination of treatment (individual treatment plan)
Multidisciplinary team
ICT programme to support clinical decision-making
Clusters of primary care teams
|
|
|
|