Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 16;83(13):e00234-17. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00234-17

TABLE 4.

Franconibacter, Siccibacter, and Cronobacter strain identification by MALDI-TOF MS before application of extended MALDI Biotyper database

Strain IDa Species Most frequent identification (%)b Reliability scorec
FR 29 F. helveticus Not reliable identification (37)
FR 31 F. helveticus Raoultella ornithinolytica (53) +
FR 32 F. helveticus Raoultella ornithinolytica (22) +
FR 33 F. helveticus Raoultella ornithinolytica (44) +
FR 35 F. helveticus Not reliable identification (32)
FR 38 F. pulveris Enterobacter radicincitans (44) +
FR 39 F. pulveris Enterobacter radicincitans (28) +
FR 41 F. pulveris Enterobacter radicincitans (26) +
FR 42 F. pulveris Enterobacter radicincitans (54) +
SI 44 S. turicensis Not reliable identification (29)
SI 45 S. turicensis Not reliable identification (21)
CB 03 C. sakazakii C. sakazakii (100) +++
CB 51 C. malonaticus C. sakazakii (100) +++
CB 55 C. muytjensii C. sakazakii (100) +++
CB 59 C. universalis C. sakazakii (100) +++
CB 61 C. turicensis C. sakazakii (100) +++
CB 62 C. dublinensis C. sakazakii (100) +++
CB 78 C. condimenti C. sakazakii (100) ++
a

CB, Cronobacter; FR, Franconibacter; SI, Siccibacter.

b

The percentage was determined from a total of 93.

c

+++, score of ≥2.3, defined as “highly probable species identification”; ++, score of ≥2.0, defined as “secure genus, probable species identification”; +, score of ≥1.7, defined as “probable genus identification”; −, score of <1.7, defined as “not reliable identification.”