TABLE 3.
Treatments compared |
P value |
|
---|---|---|
Roots | Shoots | |
Control versus C. michiganensis subsp. michiganensis | 0.001 | 0.003 |
Control versus LBUM300, LBUM300ΔhcnC, and LBUM300ΔphlD | 0.656 | 0.541 |
C. michiganensis subsp. michiganensis versus LBUM300, LBUM300ΔhcnC, and LBUM300ΔphlD | 0.000 | 0.002 |
Control versus C. michiganensis subsp. michiganensis + LBUM300, C. michiganensis subsp. michiganensis + LBUM300ΔhcnC, and C. michiganensis subsp. michiganensis + LBUM300ΔphlD | 0.229 | 0.159 |
C. michiganensis subsp. michiganensis versus C. michiganensis subsp. michiganensis + LBUM300, C. michiganensis subsp. michiganensis + LBUM300ΔhcnC, and C. michiganensis subsp. michiganensis + LBUM300ΔphlD | 0.003 | 0.016 |
C. michiganensis subsp. michiganensis + LBUM300 versus C. michiganensis subsp. michiganensis + LBUM300ΔhcnC and C. michiganensis subsp. michiganensis + LBUM300ΔphlD | 0.358 | 0.533 |
C. michiganensis subsp. michiganensis + LBUM300ΔhcnC versus C. michiganensis subsp. michiganensis + LBUM300ΔphlD | 0.491 | 0.857 |
Significant values (P < 0.05) are in bold; n = 8 for each treatment.