Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 21;14:30. doi: 10.1186/s12983-017-0208-y

Table 2.

Values used to calculate PrR under different scenarios for the smoothness of the regression model for fecundity, presented for each population separately and for the combined data set

SEPARATE POPULATION ANALYSES
Age B Age M TB TM Japan South Africa
Smoothing function degrees of freedom JP SA JP SA JP SA JP SA PrR H 0 99% CI PrR H 0 99% CI
2.1 9 9 45 38 18.96 18.96 1.09 2.78 0.06 0.00–0.11 0.15 0.00–0.11
2.9 9 9 43 37 18.96 18.96 1.49 3.09 0.08 0.00–0.11 0.16 0.00–0.11
3.7 9 10 43 35 18.96 18.14 1.49 3.76 0.08 0.00–0.09 0.21 0.00–0.11
4.5 9 11 43 33 18.96 17.33 1.49 4.49 0.08 0.00–0.10 0.26 0.00–0.11
5.3 9 12 42 32 18.96 16.55 1.72 4.88 0.09 0.00–0.09 0.29 0.00–0.11
6.1 9 12 42 31 18.96 16.55 1.72 5.29 0.09 0.00–0.06 0.32 0.00–0.10
6.9 9 12 41 30 18.96 16.55 1.96 5.72 0.10 0.00–0.04 0.35 0.00–0.09
7.7 9 12 40 29 18.96 16.55 2.22 6.17 0.12 0.00–0.05 0.37 0.00–0.09
8.5 9 12 40 29 18.96 16.55 2.22 6.17 0.12 0.00–0.04 0.37 0.00–0.04
8.9 9 12 40 29 18.96 16.55 2.22 6.17 0.12 0.00–0.03 0.37 0.00–0.03
COMBINED POPULATION ANALYSIS
Smoothing function degrees of freedom Age B Age M TB TM PrR H 0 99% CI
2.1 9 42 18.96 1.72 0.09 0.00–0.11
2.9 9 41 18.96 1.96 0.10 0.00–0.11
3.7 9 41 18.96 1.96 0.10 0.00–0.11
4.5 10 40 18.14 2.22 0.12 0.00–0.10
5.3 10 40 18.14 2.22 0.12 0.00–0.10
6.1 10 40 18.14 2.22 0.12 0.00–0.10
6.9 10 39 18.14 2.49 0.14 0.00–0.10
7.7 10 39 18.14 2.49 0.14 0.00–0.09
8.5 10 39 18.14 2.49 0.14 0.00–0.07
8.9 10 39 18.14 2.49 0.14 0.00–0.08

See the main text, and Levitis and Lackey [9] for definitions