Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 21;18:310. doi: 10.1186/s12859-017-1726-5

Table 4.

Comparisons between outputs generated by different conditions of OrthoReD, OrthologID, and OrthoDB

Database FLY PLANT
Conditions Compared ReD_s.aln ReD_s.aln ReD_s.aln ReD_f.aln ReD_f.aln OID ReD_AB ReD_SW ReD_n5 ReD_n6 ReD_n7 ReD_n8 ReD_n9 ReD_n10 ReD_n5 ReD_n5 ReD_AB ReD_n5 ReD_n6 ReD_n7 ReD_n8 ReD_n9
ReD_f.aln OID ODB OID ODB ODB OID OID OID OID OID OID OID OID ReD_AB ReD_SW ReD_SW ReD_n6 ReD_n7 ReD_n8 ReD_n9 ReD_n10
average % id 96.4% 88.1% 81.2% 88.2% 81.4% 80.5% 58.7% 59.8% 60.5% 61.1% 61.2% 61.3% 61.6% 61.8% 77.9% 72.2% 71.0% 82.3% 85.8% 85.7% 86.1% 87.3%
% 100% id 89.5% 68.1% 55.1% 68.3% 55.1% 56.2% 33.9% 36.1% 35.4% 36.4% 36.8% 36.9% 37.4% 37.7% 58.1% 53.2% 51.3% 62.0% 69.0% 70.0% 71.0% 80.6%
% > =90% id 92.2% 76.7% 66.7% 76.8% 67.0% 67.1% 41.2% 42.6% 43.3% 44.4% 44.8% 44.9% 45.5% 45.9% 65.4% 59.3% 57.8% 72.2% 77.8% 77.8% 78.8% 87.3%