Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 1;8(8):1498–1506. doi: 10.7150/jca.18626

Table 2.

Survival data of the eligible studies in this meta-analysis

Author Year Tumor type Sample size Survival analysis Multivariate analysis HR statistic Hazard ratios(95% CI) RNA extraction Reference control
OS PFS OS PFS
Zheng JF 2016 PC 96 Yes Yes Yes Data in paper 2.292 (1.370-3.528) 2.276 (1.199-2.768) TRIzol(Invitrogen) GAPDH
Chen SF 2016 SCLC 112 Yes NA Yes Data in paper 2.034 (1.216-3.402) NA RNAiso Plus (TAKARA) GAPDH
Huang SY 2016 OC 109 Yes NA Yes Data in paper 2.938 (1.526-5.873) NA TRIzol(Invitrogen) GAPDH
Wang CY 2015 GC 85 Yes Yes Yes Data in paper 2.405 (1.194-5.417) 2.315 (1.097-5.283) TRIzol(Invitrogen) GAPDH
Chen X 2015 CSCC 123 Yes Yes Yes Data in paper 2.813 (1.504-6.172) 3.072 (1.716-8.174) TRIzol(Invitrogen) GAPDH
Zhang XL 2015 ESCC 227 Yes NA Yes Data in paper 1.432 (1.005-2.041) NA Total Nucleic Acid Isolation Kit (Ambion) RNU6B
Cai Y 2015 BC1 67 Yes NA No Survival curve 3.87 ( 1.57-9.50 ) NA TRIzol(Thermo) GAPDH

OS Overall survival, PFS progression free survival, PC prostate cancer, SCLC small cell lung cancer, OC Ovarian cancer, GC gastric cancer, CSCC cervical squamous cell cancer, BC1 breast cancer, ESCC esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, Y Yes, NA not available, 95%CI 95% confidence interval.