Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 21.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Test Assess Model. 2016;58(1):183–219.

Table 10. PROMIS anxiety short form item set: Differential item function (DIF) results. Language subgroup comparison, English vs. Spanish for Hispanics only (n = 703; n = 335).

Item description IRTPRO lordif Magnitude (NCDIF) Effect Size T1
I felt fearful U* U 0.0260 -0.1357
I felt anxious U* 0.0493 0.1980
I felt worried NU; U 0.0026 -0.0433
I found it hard to focus on anything other than my anxiety U 0.0063 0.0497
I felt nervous U 0.0110 -0.0844
I felt uneasy 0.0050 -0.0577
I felt tense 0.0062 0.0244
My worries overwhelmed me U 0.0089 0.0621
I felt like I needed help for my anxiety 0.0059 0.0595
Many situations made me worry U NU*; U* 0.1440 -0.3508
I had difficulty calming down U U 0.0285 -0.1328

Item 10 has the non-compensatory differential item functioning (NCDIF) value larger than the threshold (0.0960).

Indicates value above threshold of 0.10; bolded values are above 0.15.

*

Asterisks indicate significance after adjustment for multiple comparisons.

NU= Non-uniform DIF involving the discrimination parameters; U=Uniform DIF involving the location parameters.

For the lordif analyses, the Uniform and non-uniform DIF was determined using the likelihood ratio chi-square test. Uniform DIF is obtained by comparing the log likelihood values from models one and two. Non-uniform DIF is obtained by comparing the log likelihood values from models two and three. DIF was not detected using the pseudo R2 measures or the change in Beta criterion.