Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 21.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Test Assess Model. 2016;58(1):183–219.

Table 9. PROMIS anxiety short form item set: Differential item function (DIF) results. Gender and age subgroup comparisons.

Item description IRTPRO Lordif Magnitude (NCDIF) Effect Size T1
Gender Age Gender Age Gender Age Gender Age
21-49 vs. 50-64 21-49 vs. 65-84 21-49 vs. 50-64 21-49 vs. 65-84 21-49 vs. 50-64 21-49 vs. 65-84 21-49 vs. 50-64 21-49 vs. 65-84
I felt fearful NU U* NU*; U* NU; U* U* NU*; U* 0.0087 0.0112 0.0213 0.0770 0.0929 0.1219
I felt anxious U* U* U* U* U* 0.0040 0.0079 0.0069 0.0448 0.0733 0.0669
I felt worried U* U* U* U* U* 0.0030 0.0081 0.0178 0.0473 0.0819 0.1175
I found it hard to focus on anything other than my anxiety NU U* U U* 0.0068 0.0052 0.0072 -0.0564 -0.0547 -0.0604
I felt nervous NU*; U* NU; U* 0.0001 0.0010 0.0044 0.0007 -0.0179 -0.0484
I felt uneasy U NU; U U* U* 0.0049 0.0052 0.0092 -0.0464 -0.0423 -0.0629
I felt tense NU*; U* NU*; U* NU; U* U U* 0.0016 0.0017 0.0024 0.0213 0.0260 0.0244
My worries overwhelmed me U U* U* 0.0011 0.0007 0.0008 0.0187 0.0210 0.0204
I felt like I needed help for my anxiety U* U U* 0.0017 0.0062 0.0038 -0.0282 -0.0577 -0.0404
Many situations made me worry NU NU U* U* 0.0006 0.0014 0.0020 0.0108 -0.0223 -0.0288
I had difficulty calming down U* U* U NU U* U* 0.0126 0.0122 0.0182 -0.0810 -0.0809 -0.0991

All non-compensatory differential item functioning (NCDIF) values were smaller than the threshold (0.0960)

Indicates value above threshold of 0.10; bolded values are above 0.15.

*

Asterisks indicate significance after adjustment for multiple comparisons.

NU= Non-uniform DIF involving the discrimination parameters; U=Uniform DIF involving the location parameters.

For the lordif analyses, the Uniform and non-uniform DIF was determined using the likelihood ratio chi-square test. Uniform DIF is obtained by comparing the log likelihood values from models one and two. Non-uniform DIF is obtained by comparing the log likelihood values from models two and three. DIF was not detected using the pseudo R2 measures or the change in Beta criterion.