Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul;29(7):e126–e133. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2017.02.014

Table A1.

Example power calculations to assess the potential impact of co-enrolment

Modelling assumptions
Estimated impact on trial X
Effect of aspirin on 5 year survival Participation rates in Add-Aspirin
5 year survival in trial X with co-enrolment
Power (loss/gain in power) Extra patients (OR follow-up) needed for 80% power
Control Intervention Control Intervention Difference
Trial X result is positive (5 year survival 55% control versus 45% intervention) in the absence of co-enrolment
6% 10% 10% 45.4% 55.4% 10.0% 79.9% 2 (1 month)
20% 20% 45.8% 55.8% 10.0% 79.9% 3 (1 month)
30% 30% 46.2% 56.2% 10.0% 79.8% 5 (1 month)
10% 15% 45.4% 55.6% 10.2% 81.5%
10% 20% 45.4% 55.8% 10.4% 82.9%
15% 30% 45.6% 56.2% 10.6% 84.3%
15% 10% 45.6% 55.4% 9.8% 78.3% 44 (3 months)
20% 10% 45.8% 55.4% 9.6% 76.6% 89 (5 months)
30% 15% 46.2% 55.6% 9.4% 74.8% 138 (8 months)
10% 10% 10% 45.7% 55.7% 10.0% 79.9% 3 (1 month)
20% 20% 46.3% 56.3% 10.0% 79.8% 5 (1 month)
30% 30% 47.0% 57.0% 10.0% 79.8% 7 (1 month)
10% 15% 45.7% 56.0% 10.3% 82.4%
10% 20% 45.7% 56.3% 10.7% 84.7%
15% 30% 46.0% 57.0% 11.0% 86.8%
15% 10% 46.0% 55.7% 9.7% 77.2% 75 (5 months)
20% 10% 46.3% 55.7% 9.3% 74.2% 154 (9 months)
30% 15% 47.0% 56.0% 9.0% 71.1% 244 (15 months)
Trial X result is negative (5 year survival 45% in both arms) in the absence of co-enrolment
6% 10% 10% 45.4% 45.4% 0.0%
20% 20% 45.8% 45.8% 0.0%
30% 30% 46.2% 46.2% 0.0%
10% 15% 45.4% 45.6% 0.2%
10% 20% 45.4% 45.8% 0.4%
15% 30% 45.6% 46.2% 0.6%
15% 10% 45.6% 45.4% −0.2%
20% 10% 45.8% 45.4% −0.4%
30% 15% 46.2% 45.6% −0.6%
Trial X result is negative (5 year survival 45% in both arms) in the absence of co-enrolment
10% 10% 10% 45.7% 45.7% 0.0%
20% 20% 46.3% 46.3% 0.0%
30% 30% 47.0% 47.0% 0.0%
10% 15% 45.7% 46.0% 0.3%
10% 20% 45.7% 46.3% 0.7%
15% 30% 46.0% 47.0% 1.0%
15% 10% 46.0% 45.7% −0.3%
20% 10% 46.3% 45.7% −0.7%
30% 15% 47.0% 46.0% −1.0%

The table illustrates the potential impact of co-enrolment into Add-Aspirin on the power of a hypothetical study, trial X. Selected results are shown from models performed under a range of assumptions about the factors listed in Figure 2, including scenarios felt to illustrate the largest plausible impact on power.

Trial X: A hypothetical two-arm superiority randomised controlled trial of a new peri-operative chemotherapy regimen versus standard in gastro-oesophageal patients. Designed with 80% power to detect a 10% improvement (from 45% to 55%) in survival at 5 years, requiring 500 patients per arm. Patients who are disease free at the end of treatment may become eligible for Add-Aspirin.

A 6% survival benefit at 5 years is hypothesised in Add-Aspirin (gastro-oesophageal). Models are repeated for larger benefits to illustrate potential effects on power.

A range of participation rates are used to assess potential impact – actual rates are unlikely to reach 30% (limited by overlap in recruiting centres and recruitment periods, as well as trial X participants being ineligible or unwilling to participate in Add-Aspirin). Differences in rates between arms are also unlikely to be as large as illustrated here.