Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 21;12(6):e0179188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179188

Table 1. The number of polygon points analyzed and the average absolute value discrepancy of all measurement points for each participant.

Digital impression technique
Participant Mean (mm) Median (mm) 95% Cl (mm) Polygon Points
a 0.0093 0.0062 0.0094, 0.0093 87722
b 0.011 0.0078 0.011, 0.011 78972
c 0.022 0.015 0.022, 0.021 78158
d 0.018 0.013 0.018, 0.017 69792
e 0.015 0.011 0.015, 0.015 81199
f 0.013 0.011 0.013, 0.013 83020
g 0.016 0.012 0.016, 0.016 77710
h 0.015 0.010 0.015, 0.015 72192
i 0.011 0.0069 0.011, 0.011 82013
j 0.013 0.0091 0.013, 0.013 75312
k 0.013 0.0094 0.013, 0.013 76118
l 0.017 0.011 0.017, 0.017 64272
Conventional impression technique
Participant Mean (mm) Median (mm) 95% Cl (mm) Polygon Points
a 0.023 0.014 0.023, 0.022 9144
b 0.018 0.013 0.019, 0.018 8998
c 0.032 0.022 0.033, 0.032 9578
d 0.014 0.0089 0.015, 0.014 7488
e 0.025 0.018 0.026, 0.025 9268
f 0.027 0.021 0.028, 0.027 10412
g 0.032 0.020 0.033, 0.031 8564
h 0.023 0.015 0.024, 0.022 8193
i 0.017 0.011 0.018, 0.017 10238
j 0.024 0.019 0.025, 0.024 7543
k 0.023 0.015 0.024, 0.022 8912
l 0.017 0.011 0.017, 0.016 7591