Table 1. The number of polygon points analyzed and the average absolute value discrepancy of all measurement points for each participant.
Digital impression technique | ||||
Participant | Mean (mm) | Median (mm) | 95% Cl (mm) | Polygon Points |
a | 0.0093 | 0.0062 | 0.0094, 0.0093 | 87722 |
b | 0.011 | 0.0078 | 0.011, 0.011 | 78972 |
c | 0.022 | 0.015 | 0.022, 0.021 | 78158 |
d | 0.018 | 0.013 | 0.018, 0.017 | 69792 |
e | 0.015 | 0.011 | 0.015, 0.015 | 81199 |
f | 0.013 | 0.011 | 0.013, 0.013 | 83020 |
g | 0.016 | 0.012 | 0.016, 0.016 | 77710 |
h | 0.015 | 0.010 | 0.015, 0.015 | 72192 |
i | 0.011 | 0.0069 | 0.011, 0.011 | 82013 |
j | 0.013 | 0.0091 | 0.013, 0.013 | 75312 |
k | 0.013 | 0.0094 | 0.013, 0.013 | 76118 |
l | 0.017 | 0.011 | 0.017, 0.017 | 64272 |
Conventional impression technique | ||||
Participant | Mean (mm) | Median (mm) | 95% Cl (mm) | Polygon Points |
a | 0.023 | 0.014 | 0.023, 0.022 | 9144 |
b | 0.018 | 0.013 | 0.019, 0.018 | 8998 |
c | 0.032 | 0.022 | 0.033, 0.032 | 9578 |
d | 0.014 | 0.0089 | 0.015, 0.014 | 7488 |
e | 0.025 | 0.018 | 0.026, 0.025 | 9268 |
f | 0.027 | 0.021 | 0.028, 0.027 | 10412 |
g | 0.032 | 0.020 | 0.033, 0.031 | 8564 |
h | 0.023 | 0.015 | 0.024, 0.022 | 8193 |
i | 0.017 | 0.011 | 0.018, 0.017 | 10238 |
j | 0.024 | 0.019 | 0.025, 0.024 | 7543 |
k | 0.023 | 0.015 | 0.024, 0.022 | 8912 |
l | 0.017 | 0.011 | 0.017, 0.016 | 7591 |