Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul;58(7):723–728.

Table 1.

Perceptions of veterinarians who agree or refuse to proceed with convenience euthanasiaa

Negative perceptions when veterinarians agree to proceed with convenience euthanasia Negative psychological impact (n = 8)
Contribute to dilemma/vicious cycle (n = 4)
Positive perceptions when veterinarians agree to proceed with convenience euthanasia Profitability for veterinary business (n = 6)
Control of the situation by veterinarians (n = 3)
Good relationship with the owner/trust (n = 3)
Negative perceptions when veterinarians refuse to proceed with convenience euthanasia Does not change the end result for the animal (n = 13)
Judgment and lack of respect from the owner (n = 6)
Contributes to the animal overpopulation (n = 4)
Uncertainty about the future of the animal (n = 3)
Transfers the problem to other sources (n = 3)
Pressure related to the profitability of veterinary business (n = 3)
Positive perceptions when veterinarians refuse to proceed with convenience euthanasia Influence on the public and social education (n = 7)
Influence during the choice of employment (n = 5)
a

The number in brackets indicates the number of veterinarians with that perception. Categories were not mutually exclusive.