Table 3.
Means and Discrepancies of Each Domain of the SPPC/PRS and GPA Within Profiles Defined using LPA at Baseline.
| Low Competence/Low PIB Profile | Variable Competence /Low PIB Profile | High Competence /Scholastic PIB Profile | Variable Competence /Global PIB Profile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPPC Subscales | ||||
| Scholastic | 2.09 | 2.01 | 2.96 | 3.39 |
| Social | 2.37 | 3.2 | 3.45 | 2.88 |
| Behavioral | 2.64 | 2.32 | 3.31 | 3.1 |
| PRS Subscales | ||||
| Scholastic | 2.02 | 2.15 | 2.51 | 2.71 |
| Social | 2.06 | 3.32 | 3.46 | 1.98 |
| Behavioral | 2.58 | 2.49 | 3.12 | 2.47 |
| Discrepancy (SPPC – PRS) | ||||
| Scholastic | 0.07 | −0.14 | 0.45 | 0.59 |
| Social | 0.31 | −0.12 | −0.01 | 0.9 |
| Behavioral | 0.06 | −0.17 | 0.19 | 0.63 |
| GPA | 1.9 | 1.75 | 2.59 | 2.34 |
Note. LPA = latent profile analysis; PIB = positive illusory bias; PRS = Parent Rating Scale; SPPC = Self-Perception Profile for Children; GPA = Grade Point Average. Discrepancies were calculated by subtracting mean parent score from mean adolescent score within each domain on the SPPC/PRS. Positive discrepancies indicate youth overestimation, whereas negative discrepancies indicate youth underestimation relative to parents.