Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017 Feb 16;25(7):744–752. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2017.02.014

Table 2.

Main effect, interaction and Pearson correlation terms relating FA in a priori white matter tracts and processing speed composite score to diagnostic group and age.

Main Effect of Group Main Effect of Age Group by Age Interaction Group-wise correlations with age
BD HC
β t p rsp2 β t p rsp2 β t p rsp2 r (p)
Right UF FA −0.08 −2.59 0.01* 0.09 −.001 −2.58 0.01* 0.10 0.002 2.83 0.006* 0.12 −.40 (.02*) .21 (.21)
Left UF FA 0.02 0.63 0.53 0.01 0.000 −0.81 0.42 0.01 0.000 −0.21 0.73 0.001 −.14 (.42) − 24 (.14)
Right SLF FA −0.01 −0.52 0.61 0.004 −0.001 −1.78 0.08 0.04 0.000 0.57 0.57 0.005 −.35 (.05*) −.18 (.28)
Left SLF FA 0.000 0.00 0.99 0.00 −0.00 −1.99 0.05 0.05 0.000 .146 0.88 0.00 −.40 (.02*) −.30 (.07)
PS 12.44 1.23 0.22 0.02 0.51 3.24 0.00** 0.13 −0.41 −1.96 0.05* 0.05 .41 (.02*) .21 (.21)

Note:

*

p ≤ .05

**

p ≤ .001;

FA = fractional anisotropy; UF = uncinate fasciculus; SLF = superior longitudinal fasciculus; PS = processing speed; BD = bipolar disorder; HC = healthy controls; β = unstandardized beta coefficient; t = t-statistic; r = Pearson correlation coefficient; rsp2 = semi-partial correlation squared; Degrees of freedom for regression = 3; Degrees of freedom for correlation = 32 (BD group) and 37 (HC group).