Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 21;25:59. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0404-y

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Scatter plot of point-of-care INR values (POC-INR, Y-axis) against laboratory INR measurements (lab-INR, X-axis) for the 98 patients. The correlation between these values was weak with a Pearson’s coefficient equal to 0.44 [95% CI 0.27–0.59]. The dash-line represents the ideal linear relationship between the two methods