Skip to main content
. 2017 May 23;8(6):3053–3066. doi: 10.1364/BOE.8.003053

Table 1. Performance Evaluation of Two Bulk Motion Subtraction Methods.

Percentage of FAZ signal remaining after subtraction* Mean vessel density (coefficient of variation) Vascular connectivity* Flow SNR* RMS contrast*
Original (No subtraction) N/A 87%
(4.4%)
0.920 ± 0.003 10.6 ± 1.1 0.051 ± 0.002
Median subtraction 11.9% ± 1.0% 88% (3.3%) 0.921 ± 0.006 16.0 ± 1.7 0.051 ± 0.002
Regression-based bulk motion subtraction 9.6% ± 0.8% 85%
(0.9%)
0.926 ± 0.003 19.7 ± 1.8 0.060 ± 0.001
p-value** 0.0034 0.0081 0.1783 <0.01 <0.01
*

Mean ± standard error.

**

Values correspond to the comparison between the two subtraction methods; n = 8.