Table 1. Performance Evaluation of Two Bulk Motion Subtraction Methods.
Percentage of FAZ signal remaining after subtraction* | Mean vessel density (coefficient of variation) | Vascular connectivity* | Flow SNR* | RMS contrast* | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Original (No subtraction) | N/A | 87% (4.4%) |
0.920 ± 0.003 | 10.6 ± 1.1 | 0.051 ± 0.002 |
Median subtraction | 11.9% ± 1.0% | 88% (3.3%) | 0.921 ± 0.006 | 16.0 ± 1.7 | 0.051 ± 0.002 |
Regression-based bulk motion subtraction | 9.6% ± 0.8% | 85% (0.9%) |
0.926 ± 0.003 | 19.7 ± 1.8 | 0.060 ± 0.001 |
p-value** | 0.0034 | 0.0081 | 0.1783 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
Mean ± standard error.
Values correspond to the comparison between the two subtraction methods; n = 8.