Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 19;8(5):2583–2598. doi: 10.1364/BOE.8.002583

Table 2. Performance evaluation between different pairs of PFC subregions.

Regions of comparison Modality Accuracy % Sensitivity % Specificity % AUC % Mean Overall Performance %
VLPFC - DLPFC EEG + 2.1* + 0.4 + 3.7** + 0.3 + 1.6
fNIRS + 2.1* −3.8 + 7.9*** + 3.4** + 2.4*
EEG-fNIRS + 5.2** + 3.7** + 6.7*** + 1.9 + 4.4**

VLPFC - PFA EEG + 2.7* + 1.0 + 4.4** −2.2 + 1.5
fNIRS + 3.6** −3.4 + 10.4*** + 3.4** + 3.5**
EEG-fNIRS + 5.2** + 4.6** + 5.8*** + 2.5* + 4.5**

DLPFC - PFA EEG + 0.6 + 0.6 + 0.7 + 2.5* + 1.4
fNIRS + 1.5 + 0.4 + 2.5* 0 + 1.1
EEG-fNIRS 0 + 0.9 −0.9 + 0.6 + 0.2

The mean overall performance is based on the average of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and AUC values. The marks ‘*’, ‘**’ and ‘***’ indicate different levels of significance in performance between pairs of subregions, with p<0.05, p<0.01 and p<0.001, respectively.