Table 2. Performance evaluation between different pairs of PFC subregions.
Regions of comparison | Modality | Accuracy % | Sensitivity % | Specificity % | AUC % | Mean Overall Performance % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VLPFC - DLPFC | EEG | + 2.1* | + 0.4 | + 3.7** | + 0.3 | + 1.6 |
fNIRS | + 2.1* | −3.8 | + 7.9*** | + 3.4** | + 2.4* | |
EEG-fNIRS | + 5.2** | + 3.7** | + 6.7*** | + 1.9 | + 4.4** | |
| ||||||
VLPFC - PFA | EEG | + 2.7* | + 1.0 | + 4.4** | −2.2 | + 1.5 |
fNIRS | + 3.6** | −3.4 | + 10.4*** | + 3.4** | + 3.5** | |
EEG-fNIRS | + 5.2** | + 4.6** | + 5.8*** | + 2.5* | + 4.5** | |
| ||||||
DLPFC - PFA | EEG | + 0.6 | + 0.6 | + 0.7 | + 2.5* | + 1.4 |
fNIRS | + 1.5 | + 0.4 | + 2.5* | 0 | + 1.1 | |
EEG-fNIRS | 0 | + 0.9 | −0.9 | + 0.6 | + 0.2 |
The mean overall performance is based on the average of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and AUC values. The marks ‘*’, ‘**’ and ‘***’ indicate different levels of significance in performance between pairs of subregions, with p<0.05, p<0.01 and p<0.001, respectively.