Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 10;8(3):1477–1487. doi: 10.1364/BOE.8.001477

Table 4. The Ψ (psi) method: arguments pro and contra.

Pro Contra
Ψ adapts fast near to coarse threshold and then slowly and precisely to the threshold [23], like other adaptive procedures, see Fig. 1. Lapses and biases (e.g. serial dependencies [44]) affect adaptive procedures regarding the accuracy of threshold estimation.
Threshold and slope of the psychometric function can be determined within the same measurement [23]. Lapses can have an impact rather on adaptive procedures than method of constant stimuli for example.
Adaptive procedures are more time-efficient than the method of constant stimulus, in which the stimulus presentation is repeated at exactly the same intensity level multiple times. Lapses can occur for example due to pressing button wrongly [45], or not fixating on the stimulus by eye blinks or involuntary saccades.
To estimate the threshold and especially the slope, the Ψ algorithm needs a lot of computational power, especially RAM memory, for calculating the uncertainty [45].
Calculations in real-time can unintentionally prolong the inter stimulus interval leading to longer duration of the measurement [45].