Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 16;94(3):437–449. doi: 10.1007/s11524-017-0137-2

Table 3.

Nutrition indicators across urban and rural Tanzania

Nutrition indicators Urban % Rural % Geography disadvantage Wealth disadvantage
Women BMI thin 8 13 Rurala Low WQ
Women BMI normal 56 72 Urban Low WQ
Women BMI overweight/obese 36 15 Urban High WQ
Anemia mild 30 29 Urban Low WQ*
Anemia moderate 12 9 Urban High WQ*
Anemia severe 1 1 Low WQ*
Anemia any 44 39 Urbana High WQ*
Low birth weight 9.1 5.8 Urban High WQ
Child size at birth (very small) 3.7 1.3 Urban High WQ
Child size at birth (smaller than average) 7.7 6.2 Urban Low WQ*
Child stuntingb 32 45 Rurala Low WQ
Child wasting 5 5 Low WQ
Child underweight 11 17 Rurala Low WQ

Wealth quintiles with * showcase a small difference between the lowest and highest wealth quintiles. The difference was less than 3%. The DHS data is used for consistency across indicators, although some variables are recorded in other National datasets, such as HMIS and the National Census

WQ wealth quintile

aStatistically significant difference

bBased on new global growth standards [47]