Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 11;13(2):186–193. doi: 10.1007/s11420-016-9525-5

Table 1.

Summary of studies included in systematic review, grouped by surgical technique

Articles n Percent static/dynamic Age (SD) Average F/U months (SD) Average months to treatment (SD)
Ligament reconstruction Garcia Elias [12]
3LT
38 100/0 36 (12) 46 (30.2) Not reported
Links [2]
Modified Brunelli
21 100/0 30 (6.25) 29 (4) 12 (6)
Links [2]
4BTW
23 100/0 29 (4) 29 (6) 11 (6)
Moran [14]
Brunelli tenodesis
15 40/60 39 36 (15) 20 (5)
Pauchard [17]
3LT
19 58/42 43 (8.5) 25 (9) 13 (19.25)
Rohman [9]
Unspecified tenodesis
27 60/40 38 5 Not reported
Capsulodesis Gajendran [11]
DILC
15 100/0 42 (11) 86 (11) Not reported
Papdogeorgou [15]
Dorsal capsulodesis
32 100/0 39 (10.7) 50 (10) 31 (18)
Wintman [24]
Blatt’s dorsal capsulodesis
18 0/100 28 (10) 31 (18) 17 (14)
Moran [20]
Blatt/Mayo’s dorsal capsulodesis
31 42/58 38 (15) 54 (18) 20 (20)
Moran [14]
Berger-type dorsal capsulodesis
14 43/57 41 38 (12.5) 20 (6.5)
Schweizer [1]
Augmentation ligamentoplasty
22 32/68 46 (10) 63 (31) 5 (4)
Pomerance [18]
Dorsal capsulodesis
17 0/100 36 (9) 66 (25) 22 (5)
Rohman [9]
Blatt/Mayo/DILC
16 60/40 38 5 Not reported

3LT three ligament tenodesis, 4BTW 4 bone tendon weave, DILC dorsal intercalated ligament capsulodesis