Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 23;8:1006. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01006

Table 2.

Bootstrap analyses of the significance of mediation.

Model Standardized 95% CI mean indirect
pathways indirect effect SE effect (lower and upper)
Model with behavioral engagement as dependent variable
AS-SE-B -0.120∗∗∗ 0.023 -0.166, -0.075
AS-IV-B -0.084∗∗∗ 0.024 -0.131, -0.037
SE-B-BE 0.162∗∗∗ 0.028 0.108, 0.216
IV-B-BE 0.125∗∗∗ 0.029 0.069, 0.181
AS-SE-B-BE 0.056∗∗∗ 0.012 0.032, 0.080
AS-IV-B-BE 0.039∗∗ 0.012 0.016, 0.063
Model with emotional engagement as dependent variable
AS-SE-B -0.120∗∗∗ 0.023 -0.164, -0.085
AS-IV-B -0.085∗∗∗ 0.024 -0.132, -0.038
SE-B-EE 0.264∗∗∗ 0.036 0.193, 0.335
IV-B-EE 0.207∗∗∗ 0.042 0.125, 0.289
AS-SE-B-EE 0.091∗∗∗ 0.017 0.057, 0.126
AS-IV-B-EE 0.065∗∗ 0.019 0.028, 0.102
Model with cognitive engagement as dependent variable
AS-SE-B -0.120∗∗∗ 0.023 -0.165, -0.075
AS-IV-B -0.082∗∗∗ 0.023 -0.127, -0.036
SE-B-CE 0.192∗∗∗ 0.038 0.117, 0.266
IV-B-CE 0.148∗∗∗ 0.036 0.078, 0.219
AS-SE-B-CE 0.067∗∗∗ 0.015 0.037, 0.097
AS-IV-B-CE 0.045∗∗ 0.014 0.017, 0.074

AS, perceived teacher’s autonomy support; SE, self-efficacy; IV, intrinsic value; B, boredom; BE, behavioral engagement; EE, emotional engagement; CE, cognitive engagement.

∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001.