Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Apr 3;43(7):1411–1429. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000384

Table 4.

Cross-correlations of each of the RSMs used in or developed from the error analysis (Model 2) in Experiment 2. The error-count (“same” responses to “different” trials) across participants from the Upright Gridfont matrix served as the dependent measure (oRSM) while the others served as predictor variables (pRSMs). The Rotated Gridfont consists of the error-count across participants who saw the Rotated Gridfont. See text for details on how the other RSMs were derived.

Experiment 2 (Errors) – RSM correlations

Upright
Gridfont
Rotated
Gridfont
Typical
Font
Letter
Identity
Phonetic
Similarity
Motor
Similarity
Upright Gridfont - 0.12 0.47 0.42 0.21 0.27
Rotated Gridfont - - 0.16 0.18 0.15 0.28
Typical Font - - - 0.68 0.29 0.31
Letter Identity - - - - 0.49 0.20
Phonetic Similarity - - - - - 0.15
Motor Similarity - - - - - -

Note. RSM = Representational Similarity Matrix