Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Apr 3;43(7):1411–1429. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000384

Table 5.

Results from the LMEM-RSA analyses for RTs (model 1) and accuracy (model 2) for a same/different task (Experiment 2). Betas are standardized against the other fixed effect predictors.

Experiment 2 – Model 1
(Different RTs)
Experiment 2 – Model 2
(Same/Diff Accuracy)

beta SE DF t value p beta SE Z value p
Typical Font pRSM 0.011 0.005 147 2.30 0.02 0.29 0.10 2.95 0.003
Letter Identity pRSM 0.012 0.004 160 2.78 0.01 0.10 0.10 1.05 0.30
Rotated Gridfont pRSM 0.025 0.003 163 7.52 <0.0001 0.05 0.05 0.99 0.32
Phonetic Similarity pRSM −0.004 0.004 157 −0.91 0.37 −0.09 0.10 −0.84 0.40
Motor Similarity pRSM −0.004 0.004 162 −1.05 0.29 0.03 0.09 0.40 0.69
Trial Order 0.011 0.002 7079 4.73 <0.0001 −0.06 0.07 −0.79 0.43
Prev. Trial RT 0.13 0.009 7129 14.34 <0.0001

Note. df = degrees of freedom; SE = standard error; pRSM = predicted Representational Similarity Matrix; RT = reaction time