Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Crit Care. 2017 Feb 15;39:143–148. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.02.013

Table 4.

Analysis of abnormal bolus testing on BSEa and aspiration on the same consistency on FEESb

Consistency Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) Positive Predictive Value (95% CI) Negative Predictive Value (95% CI)
Ice 25% (5–70%) 77% (60−89%) 13% (2−47%) 89% (72−96%)
Puree 100% (34–100%) 78% (62−88%) 20% (6−51%) 100% (88−100%)
Nectar-thick 75% (30–95%) 61% (41−78%) 25% (9−53%) 93% (70−99%)
Thin 56% (27–81%) 66% (48−80%) 31% (14−56%) 84% (65−94%)
Solid n/ac n/ac n/ac n/ac
a

BSE = bedside swallowing evaluation

b

FEES = flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing

c

The one patient who aspirated on solids on FEES did not get a BSE trial of solids