Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 23.
Published in final edited form as: Nano Lett. 2016 Nov 15;16(12):7551–7564. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03378

Table 1.

Chemical Characterization of NDGa

NDG NDA Gd–C5–COOH
Gd(III) content (μmol mg−1) 1.5 ± 0.2 n.a. n.a.
primary amines (μmol mg−1) 0.2 ± 0.1 1.6 ± 0.3 n.a.
r1 at 1.4 T (mM−1 s−1) 11.1 ± 0.9 n.a. 6.4 ± 0.8
r2 at 1.4 T (mM−1 s−1) 16.1 ± 0.9 n.a. 10.4 ± 0.8
r1/r2 at 1.4 T 0.69 n.a 0.61
r1 at 7 T (mM−1 s−1) 11.5 ± 0.8 n.a 4.8 ± 0.7
r2 at 7 T (mM−1 s−1) 15.5 ± 0.8 n.a. 8.1 ± 0.7
r1/r2 at 7 T 0.74 n.a. 0.59
a

Gd(III) content of NDG is quantified by ICP-MS. Peptide coupling is verified by comparing primary amine content in NDA (pre-coupling) and NDG (post-coupling). Primary amine content is assessed using a modified Kaiser test41 (see Figure S4). The number of primary amines is lower in NDG compared to NDA as a majority of surface amines are modified to amides post-chelate coupling. r1 for NDG is two-fold greater, and r2 is 1.5-fold greater, than Gd–C5–COOH at 1.4 T. Unlike other nanoformulations bearing Gd(III) that suffer from less efficient relaxation kinetics at higher field strengths, the longitudinal relaxivity of NDG and r1/r2 ratio are maintained at 7 T. n.a. = not applicable.