Table 2.
Antimicrobial resistance phenotypesa | Strain typeb | Totalc | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
STR | 5 | 41 | (36.28) | |
STR SMX GEN | 5 | 17 | (15.04) | |
SMX TMS TET | 4 | 11 | (9.73) | |
STR SMX GEN TET | 3 | 8 | (7.08) | |
STR SMX TMS TET | 5 | 7 | (6.19) | |
STR SMX | 2 | 3 | (2.65) | |
STR SMX GEN TMS TET | 2 | 3 | (2.65) | |
CHL | 2 | 2 | (1.77) | |
STR SMX GEN CEP | 1 | 2 | (1.77) | |
STR TET CHL | 1 | 2 | (1.77) | |
TET | 2 | 2 | (1.77) | |
TET CEP CHL | 2 | 2 | (1.77) | |
AMP | 1 | 1 | (0.88) | |
STR SMX CEP | 1 | 1 | (0.88) | |
STR SMX AXO FOX TIO AMI APR NAL | 1 | 1 | (0.88) | |
STR SMX GEN AMP | 1 | 1 | (0.88) | |
SMX GEN | 1 | 1 | (0.88) | |
STR GEN | 1 | 1 | (0.88) | |
STR SMX GEN TET AMP | 1 | 1 | (0.88) | |
SMX TET TMS CEP CHL KAN | 1 | 1 | (0.88) | |
STR SMX TET TMS CHL | 1 | 1 | (0.88) | |
CEP AMP | 1 | 1 | (0.88) | |
SMX TMS | 1 | 1 | (0.88) | |
TMS TET | 1 | 1 | (0.88) | |
SMX | 1 | 1 | (0.88) | |
“STR SMX” alone or with another antimicrobial resistance | 47 | (41.59) | p < 0.05d | |
“STR SMX GEN” alone or with another antimicrobial resistance | 32 | 28.32% | p < 0.05e | |
Diversity (Reciprocal Simpson’s Index) = 1.20 | ||||
Evenness = 0.26 |
aResistance profiles to the following antibiotics: AMP, ampicillin; AUG, augmentin; FOX, cefoxitin; CEP, cephalothin; GEN, gentamicin; KAN, kanamycin, STR, streptomycin; AMI, amikacin; NAL, nalidixic acid; TET, tetracycline; SMX, sulfadimethoxine; TMS, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; and CHL, chloramphenicol.
bNumber of different S. enterica serovar or strain type with antimicrobial resistance phenotype.
c( ) Percentage of total antimicrobial resistance phenotypes identified.
dLinkage of STR with SMX as determined by the chi-squared test.
eLinkage between STR and SMX with GEN as determined by the chi-squared test.