Skip to main content
. 2017 May-Jun;25(3):290–298. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0414

Table 2. Multiple comparisons between groups.

  Kruskal-Wallis statistical analysis
Scores   0 1 2 3 Median[IQR] P
Coronal Beveled Needle - - 8 7 2[2-3]ac <.001
Double Side - Needle - - 10 5 2[2-3]ac
CanalBrush - - 14 1 2[2-2]ac
XP-endo Finisher - 4 11 - 2[1-2]bc
Vibringe - 2 13 - 2[2-2]ac
PUI 7 5 3 - 1[0-1]b
LAI 6 6 3 - 1[0-1]b
Middle Beveled Needle - - 5 10 3[2-3]a <.001
Double Side - Needle - - 5 10 3[2-3]a
CanalBrush - 3 9 3 2[2-2]a
XP-endo Finisher - 4 9 2 2[1-2]ac
Vibringe - 1 12 2 2[2-2]a
PUI 7 5 3 - 1[0-1]bc
LAI 6 8 1 - 1[0-1]b
Apical Beveled Needle - - 1 14 3[3-3]a <.001
Double Side - Needle - - 2 13 3[3-3]a
CanalBrush - 1 7 7 2[2-3]a
XP-endo Finisher - - 7 8 3[2-3]a
Vibringe - - 8 7 2[2-3]a
PUI 1 7 7 - 1[1-2]b
LAI 2 5 8 - 2[1-2]b