Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 23.
Published in final edited form as: J Res Pers. 2016 Dec 24;66:46–53. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2016.12.006

Table 1.

Characteristics of the Samples

WLSG WLSS HRS NHATS

Variables M/% SD M/% SD M/% SD M/% SD
Age (Years) 71.18 0.90 71.74 4.94 74.04 6.82 78.94 7.26
Sex (% women) 54% - 53% - 55% - 56% -
Race (% black) - - - - 9% - 17% -
Ethnicity (% hispanic) - - - - 5% - 4% -
Education1 13.87 2.40 14.08 2.60 12.67 2.93 5.41 2.26
Frailty2 0.00 2.05 0.00 2.16 0.00 2.30 0.43 1.922
Neuroticism3 3.01 0.92 3.01 0.93 1.99 0.57 2.19 0.83
Extraversion3 3.80 0.86 3.76 0.88 3.22 0.53 3.17 0.73
Openness3 3.46 0.76 3.45 0.73 2.92 0.53 2.86 0.80
Agreeableness3 4.81 0.71 4.82 0.70 3.53 0.46 3.59 0.50
Conscientiousness3 4.76 0.70 4.73 0.72 3.35 0.46 3.27 0.69

Note. WLSG: N= 4138; WLSS: N= 1696; HRS: N= 3117; NHATS: N= 2026

1

Education was reported in years in the WLS and the HRS, whereas it was measured on a scale ranging from 1 (No schooling completed) to 9 (Master’s, professional or doctoral degree) in the NHATS

2

Sum of z-scores of walking speed, grip strength, BMI, and fatigue. A yes (1) or no (0) format was used in the NHATS for the measure of fatigue, and added to the z-scores of the other components.

3

Personality was assessed using a 6-point rating scale in the WLSG and WLSS, and a 4-point scale in the HRS and the NHATS