Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 23;12(6):e0179785. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179785

Table 1. Biochemical profile at 21 days of pregnancy in non-diabetic and diabetic rats not treated or treated with Hibiscus rosa-sinensis aqueous extract during pregnancy.

Groups
Non-diabetic
(n = 12)
Non-diabetic treated (n = 13) Diabetic
(n = 12)
Diabetic treated (n = 11)
TG (mg/dL) 136.1 ± 14.6 195.3 ± 33.6 591.3 ± 53.3* 334.1 ± 104.1#
CHO (mg/dL) 81.3 ± 1.8 114.6 ± 15.4 143.5 ± 12.3* 111.6 ± 9.2
HDL-c (mg/dL) 43.7 ± 2.0 24.0 ± 2.4* 15.3 ± 1.4* 22.4 ± 1.2#
VLDL-c (mg/dL) 27.2 ± 2.9 39.1 ± 6.7 118.3 ± 10.6* 66.8 ± 20.7#
AI 1.0 ± 0.1 4.3 ± 0.9* 8.6 ± 1.4* 4.6 ± 0.7#
CRI 2.0 ± 0.1 5.3 ± 0.9* 9.8 ± 1.5* 5.6 ± 0.7#
MDA (nM/mg protein) 92.2 ± 3.0 88.2 ± 10.3 214.5 ± 8.6* 183.5 ± 13.4$
SOD (U/mg protein) 4.6 ± 0.3 4.5 ± 0.4 4.9 ± 0.4 6.4 ±0.6$
GSH-t (U/mg protein) 13.1 ± 0.5 16.6 ± 0.5 16.7 ± 1.2 15.9 ± 1.1
Thiol groups (mM/mg protein) 1.2 ± 0.1 1.4 ± 0.1 1.2 ± 0.1 1.1 ± 0.1
CAT (U/mg protein) 6.5 ± 0.4 7.6 ± 1.3 4.5 ± 0.5 4.0 ± 0.7

Data shown as mean ± standard error (SD).

*p < 0.05 compared to non-diabetic group

#p < 0.05 compared to diabetic group

$p < 0.05 compared to non-diabetic treated group (t test).