Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 23;7:4154. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04505-y

Table 3.

Multivariate logistic analysis to find the predictor of double J ureteral stent related pain based on USSQ pain score.

Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
OR 95% CI p-value OR 95% CI p-value
Naftopidil (vs control) 0.691 0.303–1.577 0.380 0.771 0.313–1.901 0.572
Age (yr) 0.983 0.953–1.014 0.276
Preoperative IPSS 1.076 1.007–1.149 0.030 2.923 0.830–10.286 0.095
Preoperative storage symptoms 1.180 1.020–1.364 0.026
Preoperative voiding symptoms 1.083 0.988–1.187 0.089
Surgery type (rigid vs flexible using UAS) 2.561 1.053–6.229 0.038 2.736 1.095–6.834 0.031
Preoperative DJ stenting (yes vs no) 0.779 0.312–1.947 0.593
Operation time (min) 1.006 0.996–1.017 0.248
Stone diameter (mm) 1.025 0.958–1.097 0.474
Length of DJ stent (yes vs no) 0.944 0.408–2.188 0.894
Duration of DJ stenting (days) 1.051 0.961–1.148 0.277
Presence of midline cross of DJ stent (yes vs no) 1.619 0.659–3.978 0.293

USSQ, Ureteral stent symptom questionnaire; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; IPSS, international prostate symptom score; DJ, double J; UAS; ureteral access sheath.