Skip to main content
. 2005 Jan 31;102(6):2147–2151. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409542102

Table 1. Correlation (R) between activation strengths and subjective reality of pain across subjects.

Brain region x y z R Peak Z P Volume, mm3
Suggestion-induced
   Bilateral rACC 8 36 20 0.85 (0.64) 3.9 (2.4) 0.001* (0.01) 910 (1600)
-8 32 19 0.83 (0.63) 3.7 (2.3) 0.001* (0.01) 470 (380)
   Pericingulate cortex -6 48 22 0.81 (0.51) 3.5 (1.8) 0.001* (0.03) 1,170 (180)
   Right pACC 8 43 0 0.73 (0.74) 3.4 (2.9) <0.001 (0.002) 300 (260)
Laser-induced
   Left rACC -8 36 20 0.69 (0.58) 2.7 (2.1) 0.003 (0.02) 2,370 (2420)
   Left pACC -4 48 4 0.48 (0.55) 1.7 (2.5) 0.04 (0.007) 90 (260)
   Bilateral SII 65 -17 19 - (0.41) - (2.3) - (0.01) - (730)
-56 -20 19 - (0.36) - (1.8) - (0.03) - (90)
   Bilateral posterior insula 42 -11 6 - (0.45) - (2.2) - (0.01) - (410)
-44 -13 -8 - (0.43) - (2.3) - (0.01) - (530)

x, y, and z are Talairach coordinates, and Z is t value transformed into normal distribution. Volume consists of voxels where P < 0.005 (uncorrected) or P < 0.05 (†, uncorrected). All values within parentheses derive from multiple-regression analysis, where intensity and unpleasantness were included as confounding factors; the correlation between sensory pain-processing areas and subjective reality of pain was found only in this analysis. BA, Brodmann's area.

*

Corrected for multiple comparisons