Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 24.
Published in final edited form as: J Chem Inf Model. 2016 May 24;56(6):1139–1151. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00709

Table 8.

Mean ROC Enrichment at Various False Positive Rates

Kinase Set Docking Method Scoring Function Structure Type Mean ROC-AUC 95% CI Mean ROC Enrichments

0.5% 1.0% 2.0% 5.0% 10.0%
DUD-E Glide SVMGen Crystal 0.77 0.72 – 0.82 27.8 20.2 13.8 7.9 5.0
High 0.72 0.67 – 0.77 20.6 15.2 10.6 6.3 4.1
Low 0.70 0.65 – 0.75 19.2 13.7 9.6 5.5 3.7

GlideScore Crystal 0.67 0.64 – 0.70 16.5 11.4 8.0 4.8 3.3
High 0.62 0.59 – 0.65 15.3 10.4 7.0 4.1 2.9
Low 0.60 0.57 – 0.63 14.0 8.8 5.5 3.6 2.4

Vina SVMGen Crystal 0.77 0.72 – 0.82 27.6 20.3 13.8 7.8 5.0
High 0.72 0.67 – 0.77 21.4 15.3 10.8 6.3 4.1
Low 0.70 0.64 – 0.76 18.5 13.2 9.6 5.7 3.7

GlideScore Crystal 0.73 0.70 – 0.76 28.6 17.4 11.2 6.1 4.0
High 0.65 0.61 – 0.69 11.5 8.2 5.8 3.8 2.7
Low 0.62 0.65 – 0.68 4.0 3.2 2.6 2.2 2.0

SARfari Glide SVMGen High 0.68 0.61 – 0.75 17.0 10.8 7.7 4.7 3.4
Low 0.63 0.58 – 0.68 10.1 7.4 6.1 3.8 2.7

GlideScore High 0.70 0.65 – 0.75 20.9 15.5 9.5 5.4 3.6
Low 0.63 0.60 – 0.66 8.3 5.9 4.7 2.8 2.3

Vina SVMGen High 0.75 0.69 – 0.81 17.0 13.9 8.8 6.2 4.3
Low 0.72 0.68 – 0.76 10.8 9.5 7.6 5.2 3.5

GlideScore High 0.61 0.55 – 0.67 10.2 7.3 5.3 3.5 2.5
Low 0.59 0.55 – 0.63 7.6 5.7 3.8 2.5 2.0