Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 24;11:59. doi: 10.1186/s13065-017-0287-z

Table 5.

Correlation analysis among the antioxidant, phenolics and carotenoids

TPC TFC FRAP DPPH ABTS MAC CTC TCC
TPC
 Correlation coefficient 1.000 .643a .857b .786b .643a .714a .500 −.500
 Sig. (2-tailed) .026 .003 .006 .026 .013 .083 .083
 N 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
TFC
 Correlation coefficient .643a 1.000 .786b .857b .714a .786b .571a −.571a
 Sig. (2-tailed) .026 .006 .003 .013 .006 .048 .048
 N 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
FRAP
 Correlation coefficient .857b .786b 1.000 .643a .786b .857b .643a −.357
 Sig. (2-tailed) .003 .006 .026 .006 .003 .026 .216
 N 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
DPPH
 Correlation coefficient .786b .857b .643a 1.000 .571a .643a .429 −.714a
 Sig. (2-tailed) .006 .003 .026 .048 .026 .138 .013
 N 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
ABTS
 Correlation coefficient .643a .714a .786b .571a 1.000 .786b .714a −.286
 Sig. (2-tailed) .026 .013 .006 .048 .006 .013 .322
 N 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
MAC
 Correlation coefficient .714a .786b .857b .643a .786b 1.000 .786b −.500
 Sig. (2-tailed) .013 .006 .003 .026 .006 .006 .083
 N 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
CTC
 Correlation coefficient .500 .571a .643a .429 .714a .786b 1.000 −.429
 Sig. (2-tailed) .083 .048 .026 .138 .013 .006 .138
 N 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
TCC
 Correlation coefficient −.500 −.571a −.357 −.714a −.286 −500 −.429 1.000
 Sig. (2-tailed) .083 .048 .216 .013 .322 .083 .138
 N 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8

aCorrelation is significant at the .05 level (2-tailed)

bCorrelation is significant at the .01 level (2-tailed)