Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2017 Mar 14;154:174–187. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.020

Figure 7. Estimated loss of temporal degrees of freedom for each pipeline evaluated.

Figure 7

Bars indicate mean number of additional regressors per confound model; error bars indicate standard deviation for models where the number of confound regressors varies by subject. High-parameter models and framewise censoring performed well overall on other benchmarks, but were also costliest in terms of temporal degrees of freedom. Despite this cost, augmenting a high-parameter model with censoring improved signal detection (see Figure 5), suggesting that the lost degrees of freedom corresponded largely to noise. Because the 36P+despike model censors data in a spatially adaptive manner, the DOF loss in this case varied by voxel, and is not displayed.