Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 2;7(6):46. doi: 10.3390/ani7060046

Table 3.

Colony size and composition prior to TNR being commenced and at the time the respondent completed the questionnaire (“current”) for 21 colonies managed using TNR where unambiguous numbers were reported (median (range)).

Colony Size & Composition All Colonies (n = 21) Colonies Under Individual-Operated Programs (n = 8) Colonies Under Organization-Operated Programs (n = 13) p 1
Number of cats in colony at commencement of TNR 11 (3 to 40) 12.5 (4 to 40) 10 (3 to 20) 0.478
Number of cats & kittens removed for adoption, since TNR began in colony:
 Number 3 (0 to >50) 7 (3 to >50) 1 (0 to 19) 0.013
 Number as ratio of number of cats in colony at commencement of TNR 0.3 (0.0 to 1.9) 0.8 (0.2 to >1.2) 0.1 (0.0 to 1.9) <0.001
Current situation
 Total number of cats 5 (1 to 23) 6.5 (1 to 23) 5 (3 to 15) 0.896
 Percent desexed 69% (21 to 100) 100% (21 to 100) 67% (25 to 100) 0.192
 Percent adult (older than six months) 100% (47 to 100) 100% (65 to 100) 100% (47 to 100) 0.928
 Percent male 2 50% (0 to 100) 38% (0 to 67) 60% (0 to 100) 0.028
Time TNR had been used in the colony (years) 1.7 (0.1 to 12) 3.2 (0.4 to 12) 1.0 (0.1 to 11)
Percent reduction in number of cats in colony 40% (−77% to 83%)3 55% (−77% to 83%) 24% (−67% to 70%)

1 P for comparison of distributions between colonies under individual-operated and organization-operated programs; 2 Expressed as a percentage of those whose sex was known; 3 “−77%” equates to a 77% increase in the number of cats in the colony.