[Table/Fig-9]:
Advantages and disadvantages of self adjusting file system.
| Frequency | Percent | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the advantages of using self adjusting file system | Continuous irrigation | 421 | 66.0 |
| Time factor | 74 | 11.6 | |
| Reduced incidence of file separation | 472 | 74.0 | |
| Better cleaning and shaping | 1 | 0.2 | |
| canal anatomy is preserved | 1 | 0.2 | |
| Cost | 1 | 0.2 | |
| Doesn’t change the original anatomy. Suitable for non circular canals | 1 | 0.2 | |
| Maintains Canal anatomy | 1 | 0.2 | |
| No advantage, rotary is equally better | 1 | 0.2 | |
| not sure | 4 | 0.6 | |
| Not used | 7 | 1.1 | |
| reduce dentin removal | 1 | 0.2 | |
| Frequency | Percent | ||
| What are the disadvantages or why have you not used self adjusting file system | Cost factor | 314 | 49.2 |
| Availability of files | 62 | 9.7 | |
| Need for specialized hand piece | 503 | 78.8 | |
| Don’t know | 3 | 0.5 | |
| Need for GlidePath with rotary files | 1 | 0.2 | |
| Not used | 2 | 0.3 | |
| SAF does shape and enlarge the canal … It only helps in cleaning the canal | 1 | 0.2 | |
| Used | 1 | 0.2 | |